Friday, January 15, 2010

Why dont teenagers use mob aggression to negotiate proper sex ed?

Why dont teenagers use mob aggression to negotiate proper sex ed?








To stop all the teen pregancies.








Why not force full education ie if the teacher does not answer the question properly or put the student in touch with an agency that can why dont the kids extract the info with 'aggressive negotiations'?








Its a necessary thing and better then anyone getting pregnant. Plus it is their job to make sure they are informed.








Likewise force provision of contraception inc condom machines in secondary schaools and the school taking charge of say the pill being taken at 2pm sharp by all girls on it with morning after pills ready.








Plus all the support and help needed to deal with all elements of relationships and the feelings that go with it.





Bringing up therefore balanced, well educated , successful in social relationships kids for uni.





Rather then all the teenagers comming her asking can they get pregnant this way only its too late as already expectingWhy dont teenagers use mob aggression to negotiate proper sex ed?
What are you talking about? Sex ed has been taught but the kids are not listening, or skipping class, or doped up. It does not do any good to give free condoms. The guys say they don't like them and won't use them. You are nuts!!Forcing girls to take meds that have unknown long-term effects because some kids believe you should have sex everytime the urge hits. Maybe we should give salt Peter to all males until they are 25. It would accomplish the same thing.Why dont teenagers use mob aggression to negotiate proper sex ed?
Why should many innocent girls be forced to swallow a drug? What if it is their goal to get pregnant? What if they want it? You can't take that away from them.





Besides, you should know by now that when you shove someone in one direction, they are more likely to want to shove themselves in the other direction. So you're suggesting that we cause a baby boom.
You can't force someone to take the pill. Its their own choice! Next you'll want someone watching them have sex to make sure they are using a condom!





Force isn't the answer, it will more than likely send them the other way.
It is not the teachers' job to keep you 'informed' ....it is an individuals' responsibility to care for oneself and make wise choices. Having unprotected sex is not a wise decision unless it is within a monogamous (preferably wedded) relationship. Instead of giving the girls the 'pill' at ';2;00pm sharp'; how about if the boys are given a good kick to the groin at 2;00pm sharp and reminded to behave responsibly when in a relationship?
your insane
first what exactly is the question? If it is why schools aren't responsible for teen contraceptives, its because that would be condoning the sexual activity of immature bodies. If its why the schools don't teach them everything they need to know about sex, its because its the parents job to arm their children with the knowledge of safe sex practices. Also if schools were to be responsible for all that as well think about how much more expensive it would be to send them.

No comments:

Post a Comment