In the past, males were considered the raunchy sex-starved stalkers of anything, anywhere they could get it, by hook or crook. That was their ';snakes %26amp; snails, %26amp; puppy dog tails'; stereotype. likewise, the girls were typecast as sweet, demure, innocent and helpless,, hence, the ';sugar %26amp; spice %26amp; everything nice'; picture.
BOY HOW TIMES HAVE CHANGED.! For the most part, males will always be looked at as the aggressor in a sexual encounter. But I have received an eye-opening reality check since getting on Y!A. I guess the ';women's lib'; thing has taken the shyness away, and girls seem to be more sexually aggressive than males. They know that being well endowed, curvy, flirtatious, and accessable gets a boy's hormones going, and they can use their assets any way they want to to get what they want. Don't misunderstand me. I know it still takes two to tango, but the ';ladies'; are using their subtle aggression to their advantage. They've decided they like sex, too, and have almost reversed the roles as to who initiates the first move. This is not the rule yet, but the male of the species isn't gonna do a whole lot of complaining if the accessability of getting between the legs is almost as easy and casual as a kiss.Why when teenagers have sex and the girl gets pregnant, the boy is always treated like the bad guy?
Because the stereotype says that the boy will walk away as if nothing happened and leave the poor girl to handle it. That, of course, is different from situation to situation. Don't forget, though, that it used to be that the girl was expected to show retraint, and if anything happened, it was her who had ruined his life. That was in the hayday of the shotgun wedding, of course. Anyway, hopefully now both girl and boy would take equal responsibility in the care of the child (or at least the boy would support the girl through her pregnancy if she were choosing adoption).
Because all men are scum.
The difference between me and most other men is that I am proud of it!
Seriously though, in my experience, the girl gets a lot of negative attention as well. The difference is that the girl is carrying a child and must be ';babied'; because it would be unfair to punish the unborn baby because of the acts of the parents.
Because men have penises. Hence, throughout history assertiveness and action have always been linked to the phallus. And thus, if one is impregnated, the ';assertive one'; is blamed. Also, common ideology agrees with this. Few court cases have seen instances of female rape. Statistically, men have a greater sex drive. However, none of this is meant to reinforce any stereotype, only to show you the common conception society has and the basis of it.
because as far a society thinks, only boys feel the urges to have sex when there teens, never the girls so the boy must have coerced her into having sex. It's also like why when and underage female student and her underage teacher have fling it's horrific and evil, but if an underage male student and his female teacher have a fling, people act like it's a joke
I agree with you to a certain extent. They should be treated the same- like they are complete idiots!
Condoms.
Birth Control pills.
Spermicides.
Morning-After pill.
ABSTINENCE!
Did they forget about these? I don't care if they are having sex or not, but if they are irresponsible and get pregnant, I will not show sympathy. They got themselves into that mess, and it could have been avoided.
Because it's his fault. Only a man can get a woman pregnant. If you don't pay child support, like most men neglect to, you are a criminal.
Thats not true.
The girl is treated like a whore for going around and getting pregnant.
No comments:
Post a Comment